Abercrombie & Fitch Pushes Push-Up Tops Too Overly Sexualized Seven-Year-Olds?!?!…Pedophiles Love This Sick New Fashion Trend (Video)
Controversial clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch has caused a firestorm of criticism for recently unveiling and marketing a sexy little padded push up bikini top….for girls age 7-10@!!(ABC)
The name of the product on the Abercrombie Kids website earlier this week called it the “Ashley” bikini, and is described on-line by the company as a “padded” and “push-up” bra.(Source)
Due to the immediate and negative reaction to the product, the retailer has revised the offering, and now describes it as a padded, “striped triangle top” and feel like by dropping the offending sexualized term “push up” from the description, the problem has been solved.(CNN)
…bottoms are sold separately.(FOX)
Abercrombie & Fitch has been accused of over sexualizing children before, and has survived past controversies and charges of racism ,sexism, and child pornographic imagery in their ads and catalogues.(HuffPo)
(ABERCROMBIE AND FITCH SELLS THONGS TO CHILDREN!!! Facebook Page)
In 2002, the retailer started selling thongs made for teens and little girls?!?!(Source)
Apparently,over sexualizing of little children has probably paid off well for Abercrombie & Fitch for them have not learned their lesson after their past experiences.(Mom injects 8-year-old with Botox…Why?)
I think that it is encouraging little children to think of themselves as objects of sexual desire at an inappropriately young age.Nothing good can come of this.(CBS)
Targeting girls as young as age 4 to be sexualized creatures by an adult as well as a corporation, is sick and possibly criminal…(Daily Mail)
…The public outcry is well justified.(Source)
It is not the name or description of the product that is the problem here, it’s the fact that padding bras and children’s undergarments at all, is patently a foul idea,that only a child molester could actually support.
The problem is the product and the retailer itself!..it’s not cool to ‘whore-up’ the little girls!
(Abercrombie’s Push-Up Bikinis for 8-Year-Olds-Newsy.com Video Report)
For more information Contact:
Child Molestation Research And Prevention Institute
Ugh, horrible. I like my over-sexualized girls to be at least 14 or 15.
thejamminjabber - April 7, 2011 at 8:27 pm |
Sexualisation of children sucks. And those over-sexualised clothing are off in an incinerator!
whatsaysyou - April 15, 2011 at 10:29 am |
Paranoid modern culture is confused.
1. “padded push up bikini top”. Young boobless bodies are beautiful as they are. Why put pads? Originally, young boobless girls went to the waters either fully naked or in their bikinis only.
2. “A&F Thongs for Children”. What’s new? Indigenous tribes wear thongs. Indigenous young people either wear thongs or walked naked. Plus, the thong is covered with an over garment anyway.
3. ” think that it is encouraging little children to think of themselves as objects of sexual desire at an inappropriately young age. Nothing good can come of this.” On the contrary, if young people are reminded everyday that they are, in fact, sexual beings – with sexual desires and inclinations – the world would be a more open and understanding place.
4. The young girl ramp modeling in her underwear is what it is – ramp modeling for young people’s underwear. If an adult ramp model walked in young people’s underwear then that would be “too sexual” wouldn’t it?
5. The anti-child prostitution campaign poster has nothing to do with the images from Abercrombie & Fitch.
6. Simple psychology, correct me if i’m wrong: Wouldn’t child molesters like little girls better if they were dressed as they are, as little girls? Why would padded bras attract individuals who get turned on by a boobless chest?
7. The last picture is a beauty pageant for young girls. What’s the connection with A&F?
Magoichi Saika - April 27, 2011 at 8:06 am |
Thanks for presenting the pedophiles point of view…that is a great in site into that deviant world.
jerrybrice - April 27, 2011 at 9:16 am |
If not actualy a paedo, then probably a danger. As their comments fuel apathy, and let Paedos do their thing under the guise of modernity
Steve - November 9, 2013 at 9:18 pm